Asus P5KPL-AM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 16:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 34.9
34% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 77.9
8-Core 79
10% 78.4 Pts
64-Core 69.8
4% 69.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gainward(10B0 11C6) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 19
14% 17.2 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 16.3
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 46 52 49 50 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 203
Write 196
Mixed 167
SusWrite 45.8
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 26.5
89% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 36.9
34% 50.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST31000533CS 1TB
38GB free
Firmware: SC15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 60 63 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 51
Write 55.1
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 59.1
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 1.5TB
550GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 27 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 26.4
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 26.3
36% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback