Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '22 at 14:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 92.5
45% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 154
19% 147 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
EVGA(3842 3653) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 23.4
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 18.1
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 152 141 143 143 141 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 200
Write 116
Mixed 124
SusWrite 148
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 18.1
72% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 30.8
DQ Mixed 23.4
18% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40%
Great: 96%
ssd 512GB
462GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 190 198 210 167 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 221
Write 196
Mixed 184
SusWrite 171
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 29.8
101% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 39.6
33% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback