Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 666 66% 540 Pts	64-Core 870 54% 870 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 37.5 32% 35.6 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 36 30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 302 306 323 302 302 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 471 Mixed 449 SusWrite 304 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 51.5 174% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 876GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 182 181 181 182 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 176 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 180 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16N2 2x8GB 467 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 29.8 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 24.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $71Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	8x

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $224