Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 16:15
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 152
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 232
34% 246 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Asus(1043 0338) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 9.84
10% 10.4 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 8.07
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.31 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 45 42 48 33 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.7% Poor
Read 171
Write 105
Mixed 121
SusWrite 48.1
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 7.5
45% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 65.1
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 15.4
25% 47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
420GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 52 56 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 84.5
Write 61.5
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 54.7
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
341GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Read 26
Write 24.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 3
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
882GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 29
Write 24.3
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 22.2
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.6% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback