PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L (all builds) |
Memory | 0.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091204 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 27 '22 at 16:41 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-750-$60
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apacer AS350 240GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 109 115 124 119 129 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
371GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 76 74 74 73 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.9 4.5 MB/s
|
3.49%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-750Intel $60Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 106x |
Core i5 760Intel $90Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 46x |
Core i7 860Intel $212Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 27x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $154 |