Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m7-6Y75 1,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 34.1 2-Core 61.9 34% 51.3 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 116 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 071B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.48% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.46 Parallax 2.56 2% 2.84 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 5.04 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.48% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D256-41 SATA 256GB SED 341 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: T88410C SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 207 153 189 219 203 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 307 Write 220 Mixed 130 SusWrite 194 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 12.9 52% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 79.8 98% 173 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
0 2x8GB 1,950 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 17.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	174x

SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	15x
SSDSCKKF256H6 SATA 256GBIntelBench 64%, 3,152 samples	9x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	7x

RAM
2x4GB0Bench 58%, 1,733 samples	107x
2x8GB0Bench 63%, 1,950 samples	36x
H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 6,118 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16