Today's hottest deals

HP 15 TouchSmart Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP 15 TouchSmart Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 218F
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '16 at 21:11
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 86.5
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 117
57% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 218F) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3316
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 2.53
3% 3.71 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 7
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAH10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50% Average
Read 87.7
Write 86.5
Mixed 86.3
66% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
84GB free
Firmware: 0706
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 79.8
Mixed 49.4
46% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.31
75% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 TouchSmart Notebook PC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 TouchSmart Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback