Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 226B
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 18:34
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 43.3
1-Core 14.2
2-Core 30.1
21% 29.2 Pts
4-Core 52.2
8-Core 44.5
7% 48.3 Pts
64-Core 44.1
3% 44.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 226B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 3.75
0% 3.11 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
641GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 82 91 82 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 99.2
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 78.9
57% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback