Asus H81M-E R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-E R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 01:55
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 188
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 347
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 89 48 2.6 18 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 249
Write 102
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 56.7
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 11.6
53% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 18
14% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$85
60GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 72 71 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 79.3
Write 81.1
Mixed 39
SusWrite 70.7
49% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
209GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 69
Write 61.7
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 79.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-025.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback