Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Killer  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131111
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 17 '16 at 02:45
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 172
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 281
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2877) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 868
Write 258
Mixed 328
105% 485 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 16.8
102% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 10.3
68% 155 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
293GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 152
Write 124
Mixed 104
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.17
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 109%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-65Z7B0 640GB
539GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
Read 44
Write 46
Mixed 44
58% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.43
93% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 0423 ZEUS-1600 1302 1600 CL10 Series 0423 ZEUS-1600 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback