HP ProDesk 600 G2 DM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G2 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8169
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 16:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 167
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 280
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8169) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4551
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8
Parallax 4.94
5% 6.18 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 12.2
6% 7.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 198 343 192 158 222 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 474
Write 397
Mixed 325
SusWrite 246
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 35
121% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 234
192% 271 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 114%
H/W RAID 1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 165 165 166 169 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 165
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 165
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G2 DM Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G2 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback