Asus GL702VI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL702VI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VI
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 09:50
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 548
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1BD0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 37.3
32% 40.6 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 51.4
40% 49.2 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 388 358 265 266 275 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 208
Write 437
Mixed 351
SusWrite 322
75% 329 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 36.5
134% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 299
223% 298 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 859B CT16G4SFD824A.M16FB 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.3% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VI Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Asus GL702VI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback