Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory13.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091209
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$85
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 66.7
36% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 142
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 30
Parallax 36.6
31% 35 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 35.4
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 85 89 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 119
Write 123
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 85.5
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 69%
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B2 1TB
498GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 23 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 22.1
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 25.5
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
12% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9905458-026.A00LF ID:01 98 9905458-026.A00LF ID:01 98 9905458-026.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5403-034.A00LF 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback