PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3048h |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091209 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '19 at 11:44 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$85
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 85 89 96 96 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B2 1TB
498GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 23 26 27 26 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $53Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 98x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 82x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 205x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 37x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 29x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 12x |
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $30Bench 58%, 87,912 samples | 6x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $78 |