Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory13.7 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091209
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$85
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 76.5
42% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 40.6
31% 36.4 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 35.7
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
223GB free
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 152 130 162 165 172 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 208
Write 179
Mixed 164
SusWrite 158
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 17.3
51% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 20
13% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 62 71 67 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 117
Write 123
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 65.1
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B2 1TB
498GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 26 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 26.3
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
12% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9905458-026.A00LF ID:01 98 9905458-026.A00LF ID:01 98 9905458-026.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5403-034.A00LF 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback