Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 18 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 159
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 165
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 59GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.9 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 8.2
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 7.7
6% 7.93 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.7
393% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 68%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 215GB
39GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.67% Terrible
Read 13
Write 5.2
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 15.4
9% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
332% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.67%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
3968, 128 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback