Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 17:11
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 99.8
47% 75.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 144
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 58.4
56% 64.7 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 66.6
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 128 124 122 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 353
Write 132
Mixed 115
SusWrite 122
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 16.2
80% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 48.6
71% 136 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
483GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 156 159 157 156 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 155
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 155
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB F3-1600C11-8GNT 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $365WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback