Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R940  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3358-A1
Memory139.7 GB free of 144 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 01:06
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 191
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 620
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 1,748
108% 1,748 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 40
Parallax 36.7
32% 38.8 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 39
34% 41.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 654 651 655 633 643 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,211
Write 2,033
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 693
358% 1,603 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 81.7
279% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 733
545% 724 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 250%
Great: 296%
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 256GB
79GB free
Firmware: 8D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 256 256 256 256 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 437
Write 260
Mixed 197
SusWrite 256
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 25.5
105% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 80.6
123% 235 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR4N-UH Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 HMA82GR7AFR4N-UH HMA82GR7AFR4N-UH HMA82GR7AFR4N-UH Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 144GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback