Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '16 at 10:27
Run Duration	446 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 87 2-Core 145 67% 108 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 198 24% 187 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA33) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 8.04 Parallax 2.75 3% 4.92 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.52 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
ACJC2M120S25 120GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.094.33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3300 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 965 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 524289 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AD) Unknown 188 188 4306108573 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 129 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 53 (C2) HDA temperature 75 75 257700003865 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 95 95 5 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7805213403 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11776491731	24.4% Poor	Read 403 Write 53.4 Mixed 7.95 33% 155 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.05 19% 4.22 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 50%
SanDisk 32GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Read 21 Write 3.68 Mixed 9.32 12% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.01 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.82 67% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 6GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.7% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 13.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.9 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C50-A-1HQ

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	12x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	8x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	4x

SSD
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples	6x
V800/350G 360GBVasekyBench 63%, 133 samples	2x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 12GBMicronBench 41%, 11 samples	6x
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	2x
99U5428-040.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 640 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369