Asus H81I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81I-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150604
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 21:52
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 546
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31.8
29% 30.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 32.3
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 377 335 337 336 340 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 459
Mixed 368
SusWrite 360
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 53.9
188% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250
2TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 245 240 247 249 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
77.3% Very good
Read 243
Write 231
Mixed 225
SusWrite 245
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 42.5
141% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 192
145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
707GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 147 149 151 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 75.7
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 149
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 100%
SanDisk 32GB
16GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4 0 1 6 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 14
Mixed 15
SusWrite 3.4
15% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.2
111% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 9%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 166 169 189 174 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 160
Write 173
Mixed 107
SusWrite 174
209% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 41.9
Write 40
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 41.2
55% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81I-PLUS Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81I-PLUS - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback