Today's hottest deals

Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 09:30
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 125
56% 91 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 206
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 15
10% 12.5 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 12
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 76 83 84 76 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 85.3
Write 47.8
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 75.4
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMY8GX3M2A2400C11 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 18.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback