PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z97P-D3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150918 |
Uptime | 7.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '19 at 21:51 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 121 126 108 99 104 MB/s
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
165GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 327 343 153 154 152 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
250GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 109 110 109 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 626x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 544x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 363x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 308x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 229x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 207x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $353 |