Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 17:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NIC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 162
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 270
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
ASRock(1849 041E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 4.16
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q6MP6G060-2 60GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.93
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 165
Write 65.8
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 66.7
22% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 25.4
98% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 71.5
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 69.2
52% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
460GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 126 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 106
Write 119
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 126
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback