Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 16:56
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 106
53% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$31
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 110 112 112 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 89.1
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 110
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 69%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 8GB
8GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.2
11% 9.98 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
395GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 28.9
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 29.9
39% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 40%
WD My Passport 2TB
297GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 18 16 17 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 11
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 17.8
19% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905595-010.A00LF Samsung M379B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback