Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 08:53
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 335
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
Nvidia(10DE 079F) 1.2GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 20.9
16% 23.1 fps
MRender 31.6
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 21
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 308 332 340 346 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 336
Write 338
Mixed 225
SusWrite 321
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 24.2
86% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 9.4
17% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
237GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 38 14 53 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 83.7
Write 53.7
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 43
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 68%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
983GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 121 119 120 119 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 117
Write 125
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 118
152% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873FHS-CH9 Kingston 99U5458-002.A00LF M378B2873FHS-CH9 Kingston 99U5458-002.A00LF 6GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback