HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 09:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3418 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 60
2-Core 104
47% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 186
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 3TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 130 131 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 114
Write 132
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 129
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 113%
SKYMEDI USB Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 11 11 11 9.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 10.6
10% 8.92 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-033.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 16
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback