Today's hottest deals

HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 11:03
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3418 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 112
47% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 185
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 295 295 294 294 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 366
Mixed 337
SusWrite 305
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 47
155% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 271
204% 272 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96%
Great: 124%
SKYMEDI USB Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 6.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 12.1
13% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-033.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 15.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback