ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP RR534AA-UUZ t3645.ch

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP RR534AA-UUZ t3645.ch (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ 4,133 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 58.7 1-Core 31.6 2-Core 61.6 34% 50.6 Pts	4-Core 61.2 8-Core 54.2 8% 57.7 Pts	64-Core 62.6 4% 62.6 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210 3,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.79 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.96 1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxtor S TM340211AS 40GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 40 38 42 48 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.7% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 48.5 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 40.4 32% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 27%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA 160GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 101GB free Firmware: P22O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 462 Write 23.3 Mixed 37 126% 174 MB/s	4K Read 217 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2 9,276% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.71% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback