Biostar NF61D-A2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar NF61D-A2  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '17 at 11:50
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 87.6
44% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 88.9
8-Core 89.2
12% 89.1 Pts
64-Core 89.5
6% 89.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650
MSI(1462 0400) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800LB-00DNA0 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: 79.07B79 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 58.3
Mixed 37.9
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 33%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$46
72GB free
Firmware: 4.AA
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 72
Write 72.4
Mixed 70.1
54% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.34
87% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%
Maxtor S TM340211AS 40GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Read 47.3
Write 46.8
Mixed 49.5
36% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.34
75% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 27%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
123GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 21.1
Write 21.4
Mixed 11
22% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.28
64% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NF61D-A2 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar NF61D-A2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback