PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 4.08% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 33.7 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130715 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Apr 09 '19 at 09:02 |
Run Duration | 240 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
73.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gainward(10B0 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 13 28 5.1 12 31 MB/s
|
4.08%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
66GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 666 675 357 277 274 274 MB/s
|
145%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
119GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 296 272 302 290 263 MB/s
|
67.8%
Good
|
|||
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 53 52 53 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
326GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 102 102 100 MB/s
|
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
32GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 159 158 156 144 180 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 4TB
172GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
33GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 19 19 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |