Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 16:03
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 88
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 353
40% 314 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315
HP(103C 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.58
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.6
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 416 379 409 413 409 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 475
Write 371
Mixed 399
SusWrite 408
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 28.1
105% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 154
150% 239 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 122 121 117 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 77.3
Write 116
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 120
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 90%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
715GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 22.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 19.1
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
111% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 75%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
396GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 32.2
Write 22.2
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 19
32% 25 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 7.4
504% 7.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 411%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP223C-ELD 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 12,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback