HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81F5
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 05:57
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 57
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 70.8
34% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 128
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 81F5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.16
2% 3.55 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 3.61
3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,835
Write 24
Mixed 48.4
132% 636 MB/s
4K Read 168
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.5
259% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 105%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,098
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.3
262% 367 MB/s
4K Read 120
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
5,093% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 64GB
56GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 10 7.8 8.1 11 8.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 28
Write 12.7
Mixed 18
SusWrite 9
21% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.1
162% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 16%
SDHC Card 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.2 6 5.9 6.2 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6
9% 8.62 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1866, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback