Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H61M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110831
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 187 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 363 48% 362 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5850 15,020 User benchmarks, average bench 15% PwrHis(1787 2290) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 20.8 0% 11.4 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 17 13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 44 26 38 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.2% Very poor	Read 83.9 Write 30.4 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 35.2 8% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 5.3 30% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 334GB free Firmware: CC4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 173 172 176 177 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 377 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 488GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 9.6 9.7 9.3 9.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 8.7 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 9.7 18% 16 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 20%
Intenso Alu Line 64GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 56GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 3.6 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 5 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 4 10% 7.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 2,312 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.4% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.8 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-HVS Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVS - $64

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	54x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	44x
Core i7-2600Intel $148Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	32x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	72x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	38x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 120GBKingston $34Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x
BX500 240GBCrucial $23Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	18x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $386

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365