Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '19 at 03:56
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 206
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 562
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350
HP(103C 2127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.69 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 146 158 168 181 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 160
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 66 64 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 25.7
Write 33.3
Mixed 35
SusWrite 65.1
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.2 5.7 5.8 6.1 5.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 13
Mixed 13
SusWrite 5.9
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.4
136% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 13%
WD Elements 1TB
871GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 103 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 106
127% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 43%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
844GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 39 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 33
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 38
46% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18%
Great: 20%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
90GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 97 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 95.7
Write 98
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 99.1
123% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 59%
Samsung G3 Station 2TB
87GB free, PID 6014
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 14.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 6.8
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 22%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
550GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 32.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 20.4
39% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.1 5.8 6.5 6.7 7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.1
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.4
158% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 13%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 27.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 38.4
42% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback