Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '19 at 09:21
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 114
60% 94 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 199
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3901) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.74
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 87 84 94 81 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 79.7
Write 82.7
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 85.4
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 Nanya NT4GC64B88B0NS-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback