Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '17 at 17:19
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 70.9
34% 53.2 Pts
4-Core 64.1
8-Core 89.4
10% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 98.6
6% 98.6 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3901) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.39
4% 4.64 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002LIM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64% Good
Read 121
Write 102
Mixed 110
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 Nanya NT4GC64B88B0NS-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback