MSI MS-16P7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P7  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 02:34
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 817
82% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,025
63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 126A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6471
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 105
Parallax 8.16
6% 40.1 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 6.93
Splatting 15.4
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1319 1179 615 616 613 615 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 1,558
Mixed 558
SusWrite 826
240% 1,072 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 57.3
203% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 1,274
DQ Mixed 1,024
816% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 219%
Great: 254%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
630GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 85 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 122
Write 66.2
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 85.3
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9S8ME-8 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 24.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P7 Builds (Compare 1,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback