bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory25.5 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 11 '16 at 14:15
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 132
58% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 366
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 41.5
Reflection 30
Parallax 50.7
34% 40.7 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 37.2
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 162
Mixed 150
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.65
4K Mixed 0.37
139% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353430322D3436322E4130304C46 0x9801 0x393955353430322D3436322E4130304C46 0xBA01 0x363443304D4848484A2D48532020202020 0xBA01 0x363443304D4848484A2D48532020202020 0xBA01 0x363443304D4848484A2D48532020202020 0xCE00 0x4D33373842353... 28GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback