bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 14:02
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 153
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 339
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.2% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 38
37% 42.5 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.3
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 58 60 68 70 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 78.2
Write 54.7
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 62.5
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
193GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 96
Write 98.7
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 96.3
61% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
884GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 109 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 142
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 109
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 13 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 12
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 12.3
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2
138% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback