Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H-A  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 10 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 193
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 300
37% 284 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3691) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 40.5
39% 44.3 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 42
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 403
Mixed 337
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 39.5
147% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 249
214% 316 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
655GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 179 176 177 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 144
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 177
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL KHX1600C10D3/8G 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 14.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H-A Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback