Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 08:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 92.2
50% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 493
39% 345 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB; asus dual
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 81.2
45% 68.3 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 56
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 239
Write 186
Mixed 182
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 14.7
47% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
101GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 47.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 50.1
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston K531R8-HYA 029E CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback