Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 19:36
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 352 47% 350 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM07H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 36 21 33 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 216 Write 154 Mixed 153 SusWrite 37.4 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 16.7 62% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 46.4 DQ Mixed 24.7 34% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 51%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 109GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 104 102 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 17.2 Write 47 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 104 37% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	239x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16