HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130815
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 12:10
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 698
63% 528 Pts
64-Core 1,703
105% 1,703 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18.9
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.8
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 321 325 324 324 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 346
Write 323
Mixed 274
SusWrite 324
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 32.9
107% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 49.9
44% 63 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
990GB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 124 127 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 175
Write 179
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 128
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 124 127 129 129 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 178
Write 175
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 128
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
263% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
474GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 154 157 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 157
Mixed 64
SusWrite 154
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 100%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
51GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 26.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 25.9
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 48%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
113GB free, PID a100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 26.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 26
35% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 11 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 75.8
Write 12.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 10.4
24% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70QH0-CMA M393B1G70QH0-CMA M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70QH0-CMA Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB 64GB
1600, 1867, 1867, 1600, 1867, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83% Excellent
MC Read 38
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 31
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback