Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 22:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 100
54% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 281
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670
Sapphire(174B 7670) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 4.19
5% 5.47 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 7.57
5% 5.46 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 44 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 21
SusWrite 44.9
49% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB
517GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 23 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 19.2
Write 24.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 23.6
31% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback