Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 23 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 83.9 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 39.5 37% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 39.5 8-Core 39.7 5% 39.6 Pts	64-Core 38.6 2% 38.6 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9802) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB 4,613 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4133101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 167 185 191 194 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.8% Average	Read 206 Write 208 Mixed 138 SusWrite 171 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 19 64% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 68.1 DQ Mixed 34.7 30% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37352E4138334331 1x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.9 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25