Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 153 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 273 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hyundai Sapphire S3T240G 240GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1222A SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 136 57 66 64 38 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.8% Below average	Read 183 Write 175 Mixed 3 SusWrite 63.9 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 15.2 42% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 84.2 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 22.9 49% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905471-011.A00LF 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325