Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 75.9
44% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 77.8
8-Core 73.8
10% 75.8 Pts
64-Core 84.2
5% 84.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8370D
ASRock(1849 9998) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.83
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 2.31
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4.13
3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 13 30 39 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 45.2
Write 48.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 34.3
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 33%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
332GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 152 153 153 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 154
Write 155
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 154
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 104%
FLASH Drive SM_USB20 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 15 15 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 11
Mixed 12
SusWrite 14.4
18% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 99U5474-041.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback