Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 08:43
Run Duration75 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2150B
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 106
49% 78 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 350
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 512MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 14.1.45485.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 60
Parallax 61.5
54% 62.4 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 87.2
Splatting 49.3
45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Windows7_64bit-0 SSD 69GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.0FCVCR
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 5,014
Write 2,946
Mixed 2,569
773% 3,510 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 70.7
239% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 383
290% 389 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 42.1
137% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 92.1
44% 92.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 120%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback