Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory	11.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.2 GB free of 11.9375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	15.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '19 at 23:51
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
QEMU Virtual version 2.5+ 272 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Memory 16.4 1-Core 30.6 2-Core 60.7 19% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 240 21% 181 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 90%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 161GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 122 Write 102 Mixed 88.4 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.7 11% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 130GB 87GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 198 Write 157 Mixed 176 133% 177 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 5.9 921% 4.87 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x11GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 11GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 17.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 349 12% 349 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16