Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	11.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.9 GB free of 11.9414 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '18 at 23:20
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Common KVM processor 2,228 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 180 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 384 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	Lighting 75.9 Reflection 78 Parallax 74.1 62% 76 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 72 Splatting 73.8 59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x11GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 11GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 43.4 MC Write 41.8 MC Mixed 39.5 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 40.8 SC Mixed 30.9 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16