Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 05:05
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6098P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 310
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4312
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 3.53
3% 4.63 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 9.39
5% 5.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshib DT01ABA100V 1TB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 66 77 73 77 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 12.3
Write 37.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 74.3
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01D4L84GB5285282400 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 0
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 2,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback